NZ Gaming Trust Compliance: What Funders Need to Know About DIA Requirements

New Zealand gaming trusts — organisations that operate gaming machines (pokies) in pubs and clubs — are required under the Gambling Act 2003 to return the majority of net proceeds to the community through grants for authorised purposes. The Department of Internal Affairs (DIA) regulates this activity, and compliance requirements are specific and mandatory.

Understanding these requirements is essential for gaming trust grants managers and programme officers — non-compliance can result in licence conditions, financial penalties, and reputational damage.

The legal framework

Gambling Act 2003. The primary statute. Sections 116-134 and supporting regulations set out how class 4 gaming proceeds must be managed and distributed. Key requirements:
- Proceeds must go to authorised purposes
- Minimum return rates apply
- Grants must go to communities served by the venues
- Certain purposes are excluded

Gambling (Class 4 Net Proceeds) Regulations 2004. Sets detailed requirements for how net proceeds are defined and distributed.

DIA Class 4 Venue and Operator Licences. Gaming machine operators and venues operate under licence conditions that include complying with proceeds distribution requirements.

Authorised purposes

Gaming machine proceeds can only be granted for authorised purposes as defined by the Gambling Act. These are purposes that are beneficial to the community or sections of the community, including:

  • Charitable purposes
  • Non-commercial sports
  • Games and amusements
  • Community purposes
  • Specific categories (amateur sport, education, cultural, etc.)

Proceeds cannot be used for:
- Private benefit or profit
- Commercial activities
- Political parties or election campaigning
- Purposes that benefit primarily overseas communities
- Certain other excluded purposes

Venue-community link. Grants must go to communities served by the venues where proceeds are collected. The DIA has specific geographic requirements — grants must benefit the community where the venue is located.

Key compliance requirements for grants managers

Grant purpose documentation. Every grant must be clearly documented with the authorised purpose it supports. "General operating costs" is not sufficient — the specific activity, programme, or project funded must be identified and documented.

No private benefit. Grants must not provide private financial benefit to individuals. Staff salaries funded through gaming trust grants can raise scrutiny — the payment must be for work delivering the authorised purpose.

Proper acquittal. Gaming trusts must be able to demonstrate, on request by DIA, that grants were used for the authorised purpose. Robust acquittal processes — requiring recipients to confirm funds were used as intended — are essential.

Travel and accommodation restrictions. DIA has specific guidance on what travel and accommodation costs can be funded through gaming proceeds. International travel, in particular, is heavily scrutinised.

Capital grants requirements. Grants for capital items (equipment, buildings) require additional documentation — what is being purchased, how it will be used for the authorised purpose, and what happens if the recipient no longer needs it.

Conflicts of interest. Gaming trust governance must manage conflicts of interest in grant decisions — particularly given the close community relationships involved. COI policies and documentation must be robust.

DIA reporting. Gaming machine operators make regular returns to DIA that include proceeds distribution data. Grants management systems must produce accurate data for these returns.

What gaming trust compliance means for grants management software

Gaming trust grants management software must:

  • Record authorised purposes at the grant level — with DIA-recognised categories
  • Document venue-community link — tracking which venue catchment area a grant falls within
  • Support acquittal workflows — capturing confirmation that funds were used for the stated purpose
  • Produce DIA-format reports — extracting grants data in formats compatible with DIA reporting requirements
  • Maintain audit-ready records — complete, retrievable documentation for every grant decision
  • Track capital grant conditions — monitoring ongoing conditions on capital-funded assets

Common compliance pitfalls

Generic purpose descriptions. Grants coded vaguely (e.g., "community development") without specific activity detail fail the authorised purpose documentation test.

Inadequate acquittal processes. Gaming trusts that don't systematically collect evidence of how grants were used cannot demonstrate compliance on DIA review.

Geographic spread beyond venue catchments. Granting outside the community served by the venues is a common compliance issue for trusts managing large portfolios.

Undocumented decision-making. If a grant decision can't be reconstructed from the records — who assessed it, what criteria were applied, what the recommendation was — compliance risk increases significantly.


Tahua is built for gaming trust grantmakers with DIA-compliant record-keeping, authorised purpose categorisation, venue-community link tracking, and acquittal workflows designed to support gaming trust regulatory compliance.

Book a conversation →