Due Diligence for Grant Applications: What Funders Look For

Due diligence is the systematic process by which funders assess grant applications before making funding decisions. It protects the funder from making ineffective or harmful grants, protects the funder's reputation, and ensures that grant funds reach organisations with the capacity to use them well. Well-conducted due diligence also serves applicants — a thorough assessment surfaces questions that lead to better grants, clearer expectations, and more productive relationships.

Why due diligence matters

Funders make grants without perfect information. Every grant involves uncertainty about whether the organisation can deliver what it promises, whether its financial management is sound, whether its leadership is effective, and whether its programme approach will produce the intended outcomes.

Due diligence cannot eliminate this uncertainty, but it reduces it meaningfully. A funder that systematically assesses applications before funding catches problems — governance conflicts, financial distress, programme ineffectiveness — that would otherwise lead to failed grants, wasted funds, and reputational damage.

Beyond self-protection, thorough due diligence is a mark of respect for the cause the funder is trying to advance. If the cause matters — if improving children's education, supporting climate action, or reducing poverty genuinely matters — then ensuring that funds go to organisations that can actually do this work is a moral obligation.

The dimensions of due diligence

Organisational legitimacy

The foundational check: is this a real, legitimate organisation?

Legal status: Is the organisation legally constituted as required? In New Zealand, this typically means incorporated society, charitable trust, or registered company status — and usually registered as a charity with Charities Services.
Charity registration: Is the organisation registered as a charity? What is its registration number? Is it compliant with Charities Act requirements including annual returns?
Identity verification: Are the organisation's contact details, leadership, and stated activities consistent across registration records, website, and application?

Governance assessment

Strong governance is the foundation of organisational trustworthiness. Governance assessment examines:

Board composition: Does the board have appropriate skills, diversity, and independence? Are there too many related-party connections?
Conflicts of interest: Are there governance arrangements that create conflicts of interest — board members who are also staff, suppliers, or major beneficiaries?
Meeting frequency and records: Does the board meet regularly? Are minutes kept? Is there evidence of active governance?
Succession: Is leadership appropriately distributed, or is the organisation dependent on a single key person?
Constitutional compliance: Does the organisation operate within its constitution or trust deed?

Financial assessment

Financial due diligence assesses whether the organisation is financially healthy and capable of managing grant funds:

Financial statements: Review the most recent audited or reviewed financial statements. Are they prepared by a reputable accountant? Are they current?
Income diversification: Is the organisation dependent on a single funder? Excessive funder concentration creates vulnerability.
Reserves: Does the organisation maintain appropriate reserves? Chronic deficit trading is a warning sign.
Overhead ratios: What proportion of expenditure goes to programme versus administration? Very low overhead can indicate inadequate management capacity; very high overhead warrants explanation.
Related-party transactions: Are there payments to related parties? Are these appropriately disclosed and justified?
Audit findings: Has the auditor raised any concerns? Qualified audit opinions or management letter points warrant investigation.

Programme assessment

Programme due diligence examines whether the proposed work is well-designed and likely to achieve the intended outcomes:

Theory of change: Does the organisation have a coherent theory of how its activities lead to the intended outcomes? Is this theory plausible?
Track record: Has the organisation delivered similar programmes before? What evidence exists of effectiveness?
Evidence base: Is the programme approach supported by evidence from evaluations, research literature, or comparable programmes?
Target population: Does the organisation understand and have genuine reach to the people it proposes to serve?
Staff capacity: Does the organisation have — or have a credible plan to recruit — staff with the skills to deliver the programme?

Budget assessment

The proposed budget is a key due diligence document:

Realism: Are the cost estimates realistic for the activities proposed? Significantly under- or over-budgeted items warrant questions.
Completeness: Does the budget cover all costs required to deliver the programme, including overhead?
Other funding: Is other funding confirmed or prospective? What happens to the programme if other funding doesn't materialise?
Grant portion: What proportion of total programme cost does the requested grant represent? Very small grants for very large programmes raise questions about impact attribution; very large grants for small organisations raise capacity questions.

Leadership and culture

Harder to assess but important: is the organisation well-led by people with integrity and genuine commitment to their mission?

Leadership track record: What is the ED/CEO's background? Do they have relevant experience?
Staff stability: Is there high staff turnover? This can indicate organisational culture problems.
References: What do peer organisations, beneficiaries, and previous funders say?
Mission alignment: Does the organisation's actual behaviour reflect its stated mission? Is it genuinely focused on its beneficiaries?

Proportionate due diligence

Due diligence should be proportionate to grant size, risk, and relationship history:

Small grants to known organisations: lighter touch — review latest financial statements, confirm current governance contacts, have a brief conversation.
Larger grants to new organisations: thorough assessment across all dimensions; site visit; reference checks.
Multi-year strategic investments: comprehensive due diligence including external reference checks, leadership assessment, and potentially independent programme evaluation.

Requiring the same level of documentation for a $2,000 community project grant as for a $500,000 multi-year investment is neither efficient nor fair to small applicants.

Red flags

Certain findings in due diligence warrant serious caution:

Significant gaps in financial reporting or missing financial statements
Recent changes in governance or leadership without explanation
Funder concentration of more than 70-80% from a single source
Auditor qualifications or significant management letter points
Inconsistencies between application claims and registration records
Reluctance to provide requested information
Programme activities that seem disconnected from the stated mission

Tahua's grants management platform includes due diligence workflow tools — document collection, governance assessment checklists, financial review tracking, and decision documentation — that help programme staff conduct thorough, consistent due diligence across every application.

Book a conversation with the Tahua team →