Mental Health Funding Reform in Australia: Investing in the National Landscape

Australia's mental health system has faced sustained criticism for decades — fragmented, under-resourced, inequitably distributed, and struggling to serve the most seriously ill. A series of major reforms — the National Mental Health Commission, the Royal Commission into Victoria's Mental Health System, the Productivity Commission inquiry, and Urgent Care for mental health — have reshaped how mental health is funded, commissioned, and delivered. Understanding this reform landscape matters for both mental health organisations navigating new funding structures and for philanthropists seeking to invest in a more effective mental health system.

The scale of mental health need

Mental health conditions affect approximately 1 in 5 Australians in any year. Depression and anxiety are the most prevalent; psychotic conditions like schizophrenia affect about 3% of the population. Suicide is the leading cause of death for Australians aged 15-44. Yet only about half of those who need mental health treatment receive it — and the quality and appropriateness of care varies enormously.

Costs are enormous: the Productivity Commission estimated the total economic cost of mental illness and suicide in Australia at over $220 billion per year — including lost productivity, health care costs, and reduced quality of life.

The mental health funding landscape

Commonwealth Mental Health Programme

The Commonwealth funds mental health through multiple streams:
- Medicare-funded psychology sessions: Better Access to Psychiatrists, Psychologists and GPs programme (Better Access) provides Medicare rebates for psychology sessions — 10 per year (recently extended in some circumstances to 20)
- headspace: national youth mental health foundation, funded by Commonwealth, providing services to 12-25 year olds through a network of centres
- SANE Australia: peer-support and advocacy for people with complex mental health needs
- beyondblue, Lifeline, Black Dog Institute: national mental health organisations with Commonwealth funding
- National Suicide Prevention Leadership and Support Programme

Primary Health Networks (PHNs)

PHNs are the primary commissioning bodies for Commonwealth-funded community mental health services — contracting with local organisations to deliver:
- Stepped care services (matching intensity to need)
- Psychological services in primary care
- Digital mental health services
- Perinatal mental health
- Indigenous mental health
- Alcohol and other drug services connected to mental health

PHNs have significantly more discretion than the old Medicare Local system — they can commission locally-relevant services and can direct funding to services that aren't covered by Medicare. This creates opportunities for innovative services, including peer support, lived experience services, and cultural safety.

State and territory mental health

States and territories are responsible for clinical mental health services — inpatient beds, community mental health teams, forensic mental health, and emergency mental health response. State mental health services are consistently under-resourced, and emergency departments are frequently used as access points for people in crisis.

The NDIS and psychosocial disability

The National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) funds supports for people with psychosocial disability — the functional impairments associated with severe mental illness. This represents a significant shift from block-funded community mental health services to individualised funding.

The psychosocial stream of the NDIS has faced significant challenges — many people with psychosocial disability struggle to navigate the NDIS; plan implementation is complex; the interaction between NDIS and clinical mental health is confusing. Advocacy for better NDIS design for psychosocial disability is an important reform area.

Key reform areas

Stepped care

Stepped care — matching the intensity of treatment to the severity of need — aims to improve efficiency and access. The model envisions:
1. Self-help and digital tools for mild need
2. Low-intensity interventions (guided self-help, peer support) for moderate need
3. Primary care psychology for moderate need
4. Clinical mental health for severe need
5. Specialist and inpatient services for the most severe

In practice, stepped care implementation is inconsistent — the lower steps of the staircase are underdeveloped, and people often access care at a higher intensity than necessary because lower-intensity options are unavailable.

Peer support and lived experience

Peer workers — people with their own lived experience of mental health challenges — are increasingly recognised as essential workforce in mental health. Peer support is evidence-based, values-consistent with recovery principles, and provides a different kind of support than clinicians can offer. PHNs are increasingly commissioning peer support services; philanthropy funds innovation in peer-led approaches.

Digital mental health

Digital mental health — apps, online therapy, online peer support, telehealth — has grown significantly, particularly accelerated by COVID-19. Head to Health, Beyond Now, MindSpot, and many other platforms provide mental health support. The challenge is quality assurance, digital equity (not everyone can access digital services), and integration with the broader system.

Culturally safe mental health

Mental health services are significantly less accessible for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, CALD communities, LGBTQI+ people, and people in rural and remote areas. Culturally safe mental health — services designed by and for specific communities, with cultural competency — is both an equity imperative and an effectiveness requirement.

Philanthropic mental health investment

Major philanthropic mental health funders in Australia include:

Paul Ramsay Foundation: major mental health investment, particularly prevention and early intervention.

Ramsay Health Foundation: mental health system reform and workforce development.

Specsavers Foundation: children's mental health.

Vanguard Foundation: mental health innovation.

Various gaming trusts: community mental health support groups and consumer advocacy.

What philanthropy funds

Government funding rarely covers:
- Peer support and lived experience services at scale
- System navigation and advocacy for people with complex needs
- Innovation and service design
- Research translation and implementation
- Community-based prevention
- Reform advocacy

These are the highest-leverage areas for philanthropic investment in mental health.


Tahua's grants management platform supports mental health funders, PHNs, and mental health organisations — with grant tracking, outcome measurement aligned to mental health indicators, provider relationship management, and the reporting tools that help funders invest effectively in a better Australian mental health system.

Book a conversation with the Tahua team →