Housing First Grants in Australia: Funding the Evidence-Based Path Out of Homelessness

Housing First is the most evidence-based approach to ending homelessness: provide stable housing immediately, without preconditions, and deliver wraparound support services. Unlike traditional "staircase" models that require sobriety or treatment compliance before housing, Housing First provides housing first — then delivers support. Multiple international trials show Housing First achieves over 80% housing retention for chronically homeless people. Australia has adopted Housing First in several programmes but implementation remains patchy and underfunded. Grant funding supports Housing First programme development, implementation, evaluation, and the advocacy that pushes for systemic Housing First adoption.

Housing First in context

The traditional model vs Housing First

Traditional homelessness services use a "staircase" or "treatment first" model:
- Crisis shelter → transitional housing → permanent housing
- Requires sobriety or treatment engagement to progress
- Many people fall off the staircase
- Permanent housing remains a reward, not a right

Housing First inverts this:
- Immediate stable housing, no preconditions
- Voluntary support services offered after housing
- Individual choice respected
- Evidence: much more effective for chronic homelessness

The evidence base

  • Pathways to Housing (New York, 1992): pioneered Housing First
  • Multiple RCTs across North America, Europe, Australia
  • Consistent finding: 80%+ housing retention at 2 years
  • Mental health and substance use: neutral to positive
  • Quality of life: significantly improved
  • Cost: Housing First is cheaper than crisis system cycling

Australian context

  • Approximately 122,000 Australians homeless on census night
  • Chronic homelessness: approximately 7,000-10,000 people (rough sleeping, long-term)
  • Housing First models in several cities but not at scale
  • Recent: Community Housing Authority programmes, AUST trial data

Government Housing First funding

NHHA (National Housing and Homelessness Agreement)

Commonwealth-state agreement — includes some Housing First elements.

Housing Australia Future Fund

Social housing with wraparound services — some Housing First aligned.

State homelessness programmes

Several states have trialled or are implementing Housing First:
- Victoria: Common Ground model (supportive housing)
- NSW: Housing First programmes
- QLD: Common Ground Brisbane

Philanthropic Housing First funders

The Paul Ramsay Foundation

Ending cycles of disadvantage — housing and homelessness is central.

Shelter WA / Shelter NSW

Housing policy advocacy including Housing First.

Mission Australia

Homelessness services including Housing First models.

Launch Housing

Housing First implementation in Victoria.

Micah Projects

Queensland Housing First programme operator.

The Salvation Army

Homelessness services and some Housing First elements.

Types of funded Housing First programmes

Programme implementation

  • Housing First programme establishment (identifying housing stock, recruiting staff)
  • Intensive support worker training (assertive community treatment approach)
  • Lived experience workers (peer support workers with homelessness experience)
  • Housing First fidelity measurement

Supportive housing

  • Scattered site (regular community housing with support)
  • Congregate Housing First (apartments with on-site support)
  • Common Ground (mixed community, on-site services)
  • Supportive housing development

Tenancy support

  • Intensive outreach and engagement (meeting people where they are)
  • Tenancy establishment and sustainment
  • Relationship with landlords
  • Emergency tenancy support (preventing eviction)

Wraparound services

  • Mental health services in Housing First
  • Alcohol and drug support within Housing First
  • Physical health care
  • Employment and social connection

Youth Housing First

  • Housing First for young people (16-24) experiencing homelessness
  • Youth-specific approaches (trauma-informed, developmental)
  • Transitions from care to Housing First

Indigenous Housing First

  • Housing First models for Indigenous Australians
  • Cultural considerations in Housing First
  • Community-controlled housing with support

Women's Housing First

  • Gender-specific Housing First (particularly for women leaving DV)
  • Trauma-informed Housing First for women
  • Children with mothers in Housing First

Rough sleeping

  • Assertive outreach to engage rough sleepers
  • Intensive support to move rough sleepers to housing
  • Emergency accommodation → Housing First bridge

Research and evaluation

  • Australian Housing First programme evaluation
  • Cost-benefit analysis
  • Implementation science

Advocacy and systems change

  • Housing First policy advocacy
  • Challenging "treatment first" culture in services
  • Local government Housing First planning
  • Homelessness system reform

The cost argument for Housing First

Housing First is not just the right thing to do — it's also cost-effective. Rough sleeping is expensive:
- Emergency department presentations
- Ambulance call-outs
- Police contacts
- Court and corrections
- Mental health crisis services

A person cycling through crisis services can cost $40,000-$100,000+ per year. Housing with support typically costs $15,000-$30,000 per year. Housing First saves money while achieving dramatically better outcomes.

Grant application considerations

Fidelity to the model

Housing First effectiveness depends on programme fidelity — particularly the "housing first, not housing with conditions" principle. Applications demonstrating commitment to Housing First fidelity (using validated scales) are more credible.

Systems change

Individual Housing First programmes are valuable but insufficient. Applications that include advocacy for whole-system Housing First adoption — changing how the entire homelessness system operates — are more ambitious.

Lived experience leadership

People with lived experience of homelessness should be in leadership roles in Housing First programmes — not just as participants. Applications with genuine lived experience governance and staffing are more credible.

Housing access

Housing First without housing is impossible — the programme needs housing stock. Applications that address housing supply (partnerships with community housing providers, landlord engagement) are more realistic.


Tahua's grants management platform supports homelessness funders and Housing First organisations — with client housing retention tracking, tenancy outcome data, wraparound service measurement, and the reporting tools that help Housing First funders demonstrate the most effective investment in ending chronic homelessness.

Book a conversation with the Tahua team →