Grant Due Diligence: A Checklist for Foundations and Funders

Due diligence is the structured process by which funders assess whether a grant applicant is credible, capable, and trustworthy before committing funds. It protects foundations from misuse of charitable resources, safeguards reputation, and — done well — helps funders make better grants to organisations that can actually deliver results.

Effective due diligence is proportionate: a $1,000 small grant doesn't warrant the same scrutiny as a $500,000 multi-year partnership. This checklist covers the key elements, which should be calibrated to grant size and risk level.

Legal and structural due diligence

Charitable registration

Verify that the organisation holds valid charitable status:
- Charities Commission registration (New Zealand) or ACNC registration (Australia)
- Registration number and current status (active, not struck off)
- Consistent legal name and registered address

Legal structure

Understand what legal entity you're funding:
- Charitable trust, incorporated society, company limited by guarantee, iwi entity, or other structure
- Constitution or trust deed — does it permit the activities being funded?
- Who has legal authority to bind the organisation (trustees, board, directors)

Conflicts of interest

Are there any relationships between the applicant organisation and your foundation's trustees or staff? Document and manage any conflicts found.

Governance due diligence

Board composition and capability

A functioning board is one of the strongest indicators of organisational health:
- Board size — is it large enough to provide genuine oversight? (3+ members recommended)
- Board skills — does the board have relevant expertise (financial, sector, governance)?
- Board diversity — does the board reflect the communities served?
- Board meetings — are minutes kept? Does the board meet regularly?

Trustee/director conflicts

Does the board have a conflicts of interest policy? Are trustees appropriately independent from management?

Governance documentation

  • Constitution/trust deed — current, accessible
  • Board meeting minutes (recent) — shows active governance
  • Conflicts register — shows awareness and management of conflicts

Financial due diligence

Financial statements

Request the most recent two years of financial statements:
- Are they audited or reviewed by an independent accountant? (Required for larger grants)
- What is the organisation's annual revenue and expenditure?
- Is the balance sheet healthy — positive net assets, adequate reserves?
- Are there significant liabilities or debts?
- Are there signs of financial distress (declining reserves, large deficits, overdue creditors)?

Reserves and sustainability

  • Does the organisation hold adequate operating reserves? (3-6 months operating costs is a reasonable standard)
  • Is the organisation overly reliant on a single funder? (>50% from one source is a risk)
  • Is revenue diversified across grants, earned income, and donations?

Budget for proposed project

  • Is the proposed budget realistic?
  • Does it include appropriate staff costs and overhead?
  • Are all costs clearly justified?
  • Does it match the narrative and theory of change?

Banking and financial controls

  • Does the organisation have a dedicated bank account in its name?
  • Are there appropriate authorisation requirements (two signatories for payments above threshold)?
  • Are financial controls documented?

Programmatic due diligence

Track record

  • What has the organisation delivered previously?
  • Can they point to completed grants with satisfactory acquittal?
  • Are there references from previous funders?

Theory of change

  • Does the organisation have a clear, credible theory of how their activities lead to their intended outcomes?
  • Is this evidence-based — does the approach have support from research or demonstrated practice?

Capacity

  • Does the organisation have the staff, expertise, and systems to deliver the proposed project?
  • Is the leadership stable and experienced?
  • Are there succession risks?

Relationships and partnerships

  • Does the organisation have strong relationships with the communities it serves?
  • Are there genuine partnerships with other organisations, or is the applicant isolated?

Compliance and risk due diligence

Regulatory compliance

  • Is the organisation current with all regulatory filings (Charities Commission annual return, GST, PAYE)?
  • Are there any regulatory investigations or sanctions?

Child safety and safeguarding

For any organisation working with children or vulnerable populations:
- Does it have a child safety or safeguarding policy?
- Are relevant staff police-checked?
- Is the policy implemented in practice?

Health and safety

Does the organisation have appropriate H&S policies for its activities?

Insurance

Does the organisation hold appropriate insurance for its activities — public liability, professional indemnity, employer liability?

Prior grant performance

  • Have previous grants been acquitted satisfactorily?
  • Have there been any issues with misuse of funds, undelivered programmes, or poor reporting?

Site visits and reference checks

Site visit

For significant grants, a site visit is valuable due diligence:
- Meet the team in their operating environment
- Observe the organisation's culture and community relationships
- See the physical operation if relevant

Reference checks

Contact previous funders and key stakeholders:
- Did the organisation deliver as promised?
- Were there any issues with financial management or governance?
- Would the referee fund them again?

Risk-proportionate application

Due diligence should be proportionate to grant size and risk:

Grant size Minimum due diligence
Under $5,000 Registration check, basic budget, bank account
$5,000–$50,000 Registration, financial statements, board check, budget review
$50,000–$200,000 Full financial review, governance documents, site visit or reference checks
Over $200,000 Full due diligence including audited accounts, reference checks, site visit

First-time applicants warrant more scrutiny than known, trusted grantees. Higher-risk activities (working with vulnerable populations, international operations, new programme areas) warrant additional checks.

Documenting due diligence

Due diligence findings should be documented — not as bureaucracy but as institutional memory and accountability:
- Assessment summary noting what was reviewed and key findings
- Copies of key documents (financial statements, registration certificates)
- Risk assessment and any conditions applied to the grant
- Notes from reference checks or site visit

Good documentation protects the foundation and enables consistent decision-making across the grants portfolio.


Tahua's grants management platform supports foundation due diligence processes — with document management, applicant financial tracking, governance assessment tools, and the structured workflows that help foundations assess grant applicants systematically and efficiently.

Book a conversation with the Tahua team →